THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JERALD R. MELCHER and DEBRA A. SPEICHERT
____________
Appeal No. 97-0695
Application No. 08/273,4661
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before LYDDANE, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 3 through 8. Claims 1 and 2 have been
1Application for patent filed July 11, 1994. According
to the appellants, the application is a division of
Application No. 08/000,205, filed January 4, 1993, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,358,480, which was a division of Application No.
07/823,366, filed January 21, 1992, now U.S. Patent No.
5,212,847.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007