Ex parte KAWASHIMA et al. - Page 1

                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                    
                (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                      
                (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                    

                                                                                                    Paper No. 20                              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                  Ex parte TOSHIYUKI KAWASHIMA, MINORU TANAKA,                                                                
                                             HIROSHI HONJO and MASARU FUJII                                                                   
                                                        Appeal No. 97-1202                                                                    
                                                    Application 08/061,5571                                                                   
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      

                Before HAIRSTON, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
                HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                        

                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                                                               
                through 18.  In a first Amendment After Final (paper number 9),                                                               

                         1Application for patent filed May 17, 1993.                                                                          

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007