Ex parte CHAVES - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-2440                                                           
          Application 29/036,036                                                       

                    This design application is on appeal from the final                
          rejection of the only claim pending.                                         
                    The subject matter of the invention is an ornamental               
          design for a pipe fitting cleaner brush.  Although Figures 4 and             
          5 of the application show the pipe fitting cleaner brush inserted            
          in an electric screwdriver, the screwdriver is not part of the               
          ornamental design on which protection is sought.  This is made               
          clear from the preliminary amendment of March 10, 1995 (Paper No.            
          2) which amends the figure description to read "The electric                 
          screwdriver is shown in dotted lines and is not part of the                  
          design as claimed."  An appropriate substitute drawing,                      
          consistent with this amendment, was also filed therewith.                    
                    The examiner relies on the following reference:                    
          Lawrence                 4,850,071                 Jul. 25, 1989             
                    The following reference is relied on by the Board:                 
          Chaves              Des. 356,213                   Mar. 14, 1995             
                                                   (filed Jul. 24, 1992)               
                    The appealed claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103             
          as unpatentable over Lawrence.                                               
                    The examiner states, at page 3 of the answer:                      
                         The overall appearance of the                                 
                    claimed design is substantially shown by                           
                    the circular brush of Lawrence (FIG. 2,                            
                    elements 12, 14, and 20), with the major                           
                    visual difference residing in the fact                             

                                         -2-                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007