THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte NIGEL T. COURT, RICHARD P. HAYES-PANKHURST,
NEIL L. EVANS, JUDITH M. ANDERSON, ROY HOLBROOK,
PETER R. STEPHENSON and ARTHUR M. WEIGHTMAN
________________
Appeal No. 97-3097
Application 08/030,4881
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before CALVERT, METZ and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3
and 5 to 15, all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed June 2, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007