Ex parte COURT et al. - Page 2




           Appeal No. 97-3097                                                                 
           Application 08/030,488                                                             


                Claims 1 and 12, the two independent claims, are                              
           illustrative of the subject matter involved, and are                               
           reproduced in the appendix hereto.                                                 
                The references applied in the final rejection are:                            
           Bergstrom et al. (Bergstrom)          4,249,076          Feb.  3, 1981             
           Wade                                             4,250,266Feb. 10, 1981            
           Ohtake et al. (Ohtake)                4,314,029          Feb.  2, 1982             
           Bereziat                              4,456,138          June 26, 1984             
           Bellio                                4,735,508          Apr.  5, 1988             
           Pailler                               4,907,443          Mar. 13, 1990             
           Storar et al. (Storar)                5,088,612          Feb. 18, 1992             
           Waters                                0 340 902           Nov. 8, 1989             
           (European patent application)                                                      
                The appealed claims stand finally rejected under                              
           35 U.S.C. § 103 on the following grounds:                                          
                (1) Claims 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 15, unpatentable over                        
           Waters in view of Bergstrom, Bellio and Pailler.                                   
                (2) Claim 7, unpatentable over the combination of                             
           references applied in ground (1), further in view of Wade.                         
                (3) Claims 9 to 11, unpatentable over the combination of                      
           references applied in ground (1), further in view of Ohtake.                       
                (4) Claims 13 and 14, unpatentable over the combination                       
           of references applied in ground (1), further in view of Storar                     
           and Bereziat.                                                                      


                                             -2-                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007