Interference No. 103,270 and most of the apparatus to be used, e.g., guide catheters, wire- guided angioplasty balloons, etc., was already known. Even the mechanism to inhibit movement of the guidewire was made up of essentially known items, i.e., a balloon on the end of a lumen. Therefore, we consider that Keith et al. did at that time define the invention such that only ordinary skill would be necessary to reduce it to practice. Burroughs Wellcome Co., supra. The fact that issues were discussed at the meeting about what balloon material would be desirable, etc. (KR-43, 44), and that some problems may have been subsequently encountered later, as argued by Coelho at CB-68 at seq., does not change our conclusion that the disclosure by Keith on October 3, 1988 enabled others to reduce the invention to practice "without extensive research or experimentation." Id. Also, we note that "an inventor need not know that his invention will work for conception to be complete." Id. Keith et al. Diligence 24Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007