Interference No. 103,270 In order to prevail, Keith et al., the prior conceiver, must also prove reasonable diligence during the critical period, which extends from just prior to Coelho's conception date of December 2, 1988, to the effective filing date of Keith et al. on August 25, 1989. The testimony corroborating diligence must be specific as to dates and facts. Kendall v. Searles, 173 F.2d 986, 993, 81 USPQ 363, 369 (CCPA 1949). We must first determine whether Keith et al. were diligent from a time "just prior," "immediately prior" or "just before" December 2, 1988. Gould v. Schwalow, 363 F.2d 908, 911, 150 USPQ 634, 637 (CCPA 1966); Scharmann v. Kassel, 179 F.2d 991, 996, 84 USPQ 472, 476 (CCPA 1950). Euteneuer testified that, following the9 brainstorming session on October 3, 1988: 9We refer to the testimony of Euteneuer because, except for item (3), he is the only non-inventor (i.e., corroborating) witness to testify as to these events. 25Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007