Interference No. 103,270 are dated "12/1/88," they are not signed by anyone. Euteneuer, who purports to corroborate them, states in his declaration that (KR-48, emphasis added): I recall discussing the drawing included as Exhibit 7 and the description shown in Exhibit 8 with Peter Keith on December 1, 1988, or a few days thereafter. Exhibits 7-8 are true and accurate copies of the original drawing and description I discussed with Peter Keith on December 1, 1988, or a few days thereafter. In addition, on cross-examination he testified at KR-532, 533 that he did not see Keith draw JPX-7, but he did see it "shortly after it was completed," "[d]ays at the most." Euteneuer testified as to JPX-8 that he did not see Keith prepare it, but read it when he discussed it with Keith, which could have been a week later than December 1 (KR-533, 534). This testimony by Euteneuer does not corroborate that JPX-7 and 8 were prepared on December 1, but only that they were in existence a few days (or as much as a week) thereafter. However, a few days after December 1 is also subsequent to Coelho's conception on December 2. Therefore, Keith et al. 28Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007