THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HERBERT S. COLE, JAMES W. ROSE, ROBERT J. WOJNAROWSKI
and CHARLES W. EICHELBERGER
____________
Appeal No. 93-1883
Application No. 07/759,6911
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 2 through 6 and 11 through 13, which
are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 2,
1Application for patent filed September 6, 1991.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/559,532, filed July 19, 1990, now
abandoned, which is a continuation of Application No.
07/305,314, filed February 3, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007