Ex parte BILKADI - Page 4




          Appeal No. 94-3812                                                          
          Application 07/857,701                                                      
          claims in appellant's appendix to his brief were not the                    
          claims on appeal.                                                           
               On March 14, 1994, appellant filed a reply brief                       
          responding to the new ground of rejection and a separate                    
          amendment on even date (Paper Numbers 24 and 25,                            
          respectively).  On April 21, 1994, the examiner filed a                     
          supplemental Answer to appellant's reply brief wherein the                  
          examiner modified his new ground of rejection (Paper Number                 
          26).  The application was received at the Board of Patent                   
          Appeals and Interferences (the Board) on August 5, 1994. On                 
          October 21, 1996, the application was remanded to the examiner              
          by one of the Board's Program and Resource Administrators for:              
          (1) the signature of the Supervisory Primary Examiner                       
          approving the new ground of rejection; (2) stating the status               
          of the amendment of March 14, 1994 ; and, (3) requiring a2                                         
          correct appendix to the brief containing the claims on appeal               
          (Paper Number 27).                                                          
               The examiner responded to the remand in a paper captioned              
          "Examiner's Answer" and filed on October 30, 1996, and                      

           The Program and Resource Administrator's reference to2                                                                      
          the   amendment of February 1, 1996 in the Remand is not                    
          understood as there is no amendment of February 1, 1996, in                 
          the record.                                                                 
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007