THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte PAUL H. MAUPIN
________________
Appeal No. 95-0285
Application No. 07/648,5861
________________
HEARD: March 2, 1998
________________
Before WINTERS, SOFOCLEOUS and GRON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting
claims 1 through 14, 16 and 18 through 23, which are all of the
claims remaining in the application. At the oral hearing on
March 2, 1998, counsel expressed appellant's intention to
withdraw claim 11 from the appeal, and this has been confirmed in
1Application for patent filed January 31, 1991.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007