Appeal No. 95-0285
Application No. 07/648,586
Therefore, the cited prior art, regardless how viewed, would not
have led a person having ordinary skill in the art to the claimed
subject matter.
The appeal with respect to claim 11 is dismissed.
The examiner's decision rejecting claims 1 through 10, 12
through 14, 16 and 18 through 23 is reversed.
REVERSED
SHERMAN D. WINTERS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
MICHAEL SOFOCLEOUS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
TEDDY S. GRON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007