THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte TAMOTSU YAMAGAMI, YOICHIRO
SAKO and MASANOBU YAMAMOTO
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0355
Application 08/022,5611
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
ABRAMS and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 8 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. No other 2
1 Application for patent filed February 25, 1993. According to appellants, the
application is a division of Application 07/689,057, filed April 22, 1991, now Patent
No. 5,587,901, granted December 24, 1996.
2 A minor amendment to claim 8 as filed after the final rejection has been
entered by the examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007