Appeal No. 95-0355
Application 08/022,561
information data and the frame sync signals recorded by
offsetting the recording track.
A copy of the appealed claims is appended to
appellant’s brief.
The following references are relied upon by the
examiner as evidence of obviousness in support of his
rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103:
Ogawa et al. (Ogawa) 5,185,732 Feb. 9, 1993
(filed Jun. 19, 1989)
Rijnsburger 0 299 573 Jan. 18, 1989
(European Patent)
Claims 8 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Ogawa in view of Rijnsburger. The
examiner’s position follows:
Ogawa et al. discloses [sic, disclose]
the invention as claimed (see specifically
the disclosure in reference to figs. 1, 3,
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007