Ex parte PRYWES - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-0423                                                          
          Application 07/696,859                                                      


          body of a patient for establishing communication between a                  
          high pressure chamber and a low pressure chamber separated by               
          a membrane (claims 16-31 and 58), the combination of a hole                 
          forming device for forming a hole in a membrane and a shunt                 
          removably carried by the hole forming means (claims 1-15, 55-               
          57 and 61-63), and a method of providing communication in the               
          body of a patient across a membrane separating high and low                 
          pressure chambers (claims 32, 34-54, 59 and 60).  A basic                   
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading                
          of exemplary claim 1, a copy of which is appended to                        
          appellant’s brief.                                                          
               The following reference of record is relied upon by the                
          examiner in support of rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) and              
          35 U.S.C. § 103:                                                            
          Ritch et al. (Ritch)          4,968,296                Nov. 6,              
          1990                                                                        
                                                  (filed Dec. 20, 1989)               
               The following rejections are before us for review:                     
               (a) claim 59 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                    
          second paragraph, “as being infinite” (answer, page 3);                     
               (b) claims 1-32 and 34-63 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 102(c) “as being abandoned by applicant” (answer, page 4);                
                                         -2-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007