THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte FRANK D. BYRLEY
_______________
Appeal No. 95-0456
Application 07/933,9601
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 6, 12 and 13, all of the claims pending in
the application.
The invention pertains to an apparatus and method for
electronic marketing, best understood from an analysis of
representative independent claim 1, reproduced as follows:
1 Application for patent filed August 21, 1992. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/488,144, filed March 5, 1990, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007