THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIRONOBU NAKAO
____________
Appeal No. 95-0634
Application 07/962,3221
____________
HEARD: 12 January 1998
____________
Before BARRETT, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the
arguments of Appellant and the examiner. Our decision presumes
familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the
evidence of record supports each of the following fact findings.
A. The nature of the case
1. This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claim 2. (Paper 13 at 1.) No other claims are
1 Attorney docket no. A29171.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007