THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL E. CARROLL, Jr.
____________
Appeal No. 95-0658
Application No. 08/069,4561
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before DOWNEY, ELLIS and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIMAR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner's decision finally
rejecting claims 1-5, 7-11, 13-22, and 24-31, all of the
claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed June 1, 1993. According to
appellant this application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/750,925 filed July 28, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007