THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte DONALD M. YENNI, JR., ROBERT L.
LAMBERT, JR., CLYDE D. CALHOUN, DAVID
C. KOSKENMAKI and DAVID J. LUNDIN
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0785
Application 07/748,7081
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.§ 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 16, 18, 20 and 21. Claims 17
and 19, the only other claims in this application, stand
withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected
invention.
1 Application for patent filed August 22, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007