Appeal No. 95-0785 Application 07/748,708 carrier material and metal fibers which have begun to melt during the thermoforming (specification, page 11). Contrary to the examiner’s assertions on page 3 of the answer, the article of claim 16 is specifically required to be “thermoformed”. See In re Wilder, 429 F.2d 447, 166 USPQ 545 (CCPA 1970)(Every limitation positively recited in a claim must be given effect in order to determine what subject matter that claim defines). Therefore the article of appealed claim 16 must have softened carrier material and melted metal fibers. See In re Sneed, 710 F.2d 1544, 1548, 218 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1983)(In proceedings before the PTO, claims in an application are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification, and that claim language should be read in light of the specification as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art). Nakanishi fails to disclose any melting of metal fibers during the thermoforming process. The thermoformed article of Nakanishi therefore does not meet every positive limitation of appealed claim 16. Accordingly the rejection of claim 16 under § 102(b) in view of Nakanishi is reversed. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007