Appeal No. 95-0976 Application No. 07/936,558 Furthermore, appellants take the position that the single compound and the two species tested in vivo are adequate representatives of the respective genera of compounds and pathogens. The examiner makes no comment, beyond the statement that the claims cover many species, to controvert the appellants' position. The appellants also point to the teachings of the applied art (specifically the specifications of the two Belgian patents) for a further showing of the reasonableness of the claimed scope based on similar exhibitions with representative compounds. The examiner's response is to note that in these two publications as well, the in vivo data is limited to the use of the same species of yeast as is shown in the instant specification. These patents contain in vitro test data which indicate the effectiveness of a representative compound disclosed therein against several genera of mycogenic pathogens. The examiner has failed to cite references or give specific examples from the prior art or provide scientific reasoning that would counterbalance the reasonableness of the 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007