THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOEL D. OXMAN
________________
Appeal No. 95-0992
Application 08/014,1041
________________
HEARD: MAY 5, 1998
________________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-4, 7, 9, 14, 15, 17, 21, 22 and 31, and refusal to allow
claims 16 and 18 as amended after final rejection. Claims 33-38
have been indicated allowable, and claims 5, 6, 8, 10-13, 19, 20,
23-30 and 32 stand objected to as being dependent from a rejected
1Application for patent filed February 5, 1993.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007