Appeal No. 95-0992
Application 08/014,104
For the above reasons, we conclude that the examiner has not
carried his burden of establishing a prima facie case of
obviousness of appellant’s claimed invention.
DECISION
The rejection of claims 1-4, 7, 9, 14-18, 21, 22 and 31
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Stoner is reversed.
REVERSED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
CHARLES F. WARREN ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007