THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HIROSHI YOKOGAWA, MASARU YOKOYAMA,
KOICHI TAKAHAMA and YURIKO UEGAKI
________________
Appeal No. 95-1091
Application 07/916,9731
________________
HEARD: January 13, 1998
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-12,
15, 16, 18 and 19. Claims 13, 20 and 21, the other claims
1Application for patent filed August 12,1992.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007