Ex parte YOKOGAWA - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                
                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               

                                                                                                        Paper No. 32                          



                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                   Ex parte HIROSHI YOKOGAWA, MASARU YOKOYAMA,                                                                
                                           KOICHI TAKAHAMA and YURIKO UEGAKI                                                                  
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 95-1091                                                                    
                                                    Application 07/916,9731                                                                   
                                                         ________________                                                                     
                                                   HEARD:  January 13, 1998                                                                   
                                                         ________________                                                                     

                Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent                                                                 
                Judges.                                                                                                                       
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                          


                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-12,                                                           
                15, 16, 18 and 19.  Claims 13, 20 and 21, the other claims                                                                    




                         1Application for patent filed August 12,1992.                                                                        
                                                                    -1-                                                                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007