THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 55
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FLORIS L. VAN NES
_____________
Appeal No. 95-1423
Application 07/928,8831
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MARTIN, FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
1Application for patent filed August 11, 1992. According
to appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
07/608,594, filed October 29, 1990, abandoned; which is a con-
tinuation of Application 07/312,319, filed February 16, 1989,
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/043,520,
filed April 28, 1987, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007