Appeal No. 95-1423
Application 07/928,883
Practiword 1.05, 5 PC Magazine, no. 2, 159-61, 173-74 (Jan.
28, 1986)
The specification is objected to under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, as failing to provide an adequate written
description of the invention as now claimed because it does
not provide support for the claimed “color look-up table.”
Claims 40, 41, 61-68 and 75 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, for the reasons set forth in the
objection to
the specification. Claims 40, 41, 62-68 and 75 stand rejected
as being dependent on a rejected base claim (claim 61).
Additionally, the following claims stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 over the prior art: (1) claims 40, 41, 61,
64-66, 68, 69 and 76-77 over Nopp in view of Havel; (2) claims
62, 63, 67 and 73 over Nopp in view of Havel, as applied to
claims 61 or 69, and further in view of Iwai; (3) claims 70-72
and 74-75 over Nopp in view of Havel, as applied to claim 61
or 69 above, and further in view of PC Magazine or Staar.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007