THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 30 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte TOSHIYUKI KAWATA _______________ Appeal No. 95-1516 Application 07/672,4971 _______________ RECONSIDERATION _______________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Appellant requests reconsideration of that part of our decision of June 19, 1997 wherein we entered a new ground of rejection, in accordance with 37 CFR 1.196(b), against claims 1 through 3 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103. Presumably, appellant has no problem with our reversal of the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 6 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 and ' 112.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007