Appeal No. 95-1516 Application No. 07/672,497 control the amount of current individually for each pattern detected. We will respond to appellant’s points in order: 1. As our decision indicated at the top of page 11, we did take the claimed “density correction circuit” into account, identifying such as being taught by Suzuki. Clearly, encoder 43 in Suzuki is the density correction circuit since it controls the laser beam intensity in order to prevent thickening of a black fine line [see column 4, lines 12-19 of Suzuki]. The encoder 43 outputs a signal S in accordance with correction density data selected by a density selective circuit [i.e., nine pixel data outputs from the pixel X and adjacent pixels A-H are supplied to the encoder-column 4, lines 12-14 of Suzuki]. When this teaching of providing for a sharper, finer image is taken together with the teachings of Hirane and Zeise, for the reasons recited at pages 10-11 of our decision, the artisan would clearly have arrived at the claimed subject matter. It is true that Suzuki does not show the corrected picture signal data being input to a shift register in the LED head, as claimed. However, Suzuki is employed to show the obviousness of using a line memory, a density selective 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007