Appeal No. 95-1516 Application No. 07/672,497 The new ground of rejection was against claims 1 through 3 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 over Hirane in view of Zeise and Suzuki. Our reasoning is set forth on pages 10-11 of the decision of June 19, 1997 and we make reference thereto. Appellant contends that this new ground of rejection is improper. In particular, appellant asserts two points: 1. That we did not take into account the limitation of claim 1 which recites a density correction circuit for outputting corrected picture signal data to said shift register in accordance with the correction density data selected by said density selective circuit and that none of the cited references teaches or suggests this claimed limitation. Appellant contrasts this limitation with the teaching in Suzuki of encoder 43 outputting a binary 1 on signal line S if the pixel pattern surrounding center pixel X in register 38 corresponds to either a black or white line. 2. That the laser beam intensity in Suzuki is controlled by the binary output S of encoder 43 so that the intensity may be varied only between two levels in contrast to the image processing system of the instant invention which can 1 Application for patent filed March 20, 1991. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007