Appeal No. 95-1626 Application 07/804,013 of his device are made from Cu and the ferromagnetic layers are of the same composition as the claimed invention, the examiner is correct to conclude that the lattice mismatch in Shinjo would be the same as in appellants’ invention. Therefore, we sustain the rejection of claim 35. With respect to independent claim 5, the examiner again argues that the Shinjo composition is the same as the claimed invention regardless of the properties set forth in the claim. Claim 5 recites a means for applying a bias field to the multilayer film so that a specific property is realized. The last paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 mandates that a means in a claim must be construed to cover the corresponding structure described in the specification and equivalents thereof. The means for applying a bias field to the multilayer film is described in the specification as being one or more of a permanent magnet, a shunt bias or an inductive field with current. Each of these bias means requires structure apart from the ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic layers of the MR element itself. Shinjo only discusses the procedure of applying an external magnetic field to the MR element. Shinjo offers no suggestion of applying a 17Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007