Appeal No. 95-1776
Application No. 08/096,686
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD S. GOLDHOR, JOHN F. DOOLEY, CHRISTOPHER N. HUME,
JAMES P. LERNER, BRIAN D. WILSON
____________
Appeal No. 95-1776
Application No. 08/096,6861
____________
HEARD: June 8, 1998
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21, 22
and 24 through 37.
1 Application for patent filed July 23, 1993. According to
the appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/855,461, filed March 19, 1992, now Patent No. 5,231,670,
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/057,332, filed
June 1, 1987, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007