GOLDHOR et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-1776                                                          
          Application No. 08/096,686                                                  


               The disclosed invention relates to a system for generating             
          text in response to a succession of audio signals representing              
          spoken input events provided by a user.                                     
               Claim 21 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it              
          reads as follows:                                                           
               21.  A system for generating text in response to a                     
          succession of audio signals representing spoken input events                
          provided by a user, said system comprising:                                 
          means for comparing each spoken input event with a plurality of             
          tokens representing vocabulary words thereby to identify a                  
          plurality of candidate tokens which may correspond to the spoken            
          input event, each candidate being scored as to likelihood of                
          match;                                                                      
          computer implemented means for generating and storing, for each             
          spoken input event, a data record which includes:                           
               the identity of the best matching candidate token;                     
               the identity of the correct candidate; and                             
               data placing the chronology of the data record relative                
               other data records in the database;                                    
          thereby to generate a dictation event database useful for                   
          improving recognizer accuracy by learning a user’s speech                   
          behavior.                                                                   
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Baker                    4,866,778           Sept. 12, 1989                 
                                            (filed Aug. 11, 1986)                    
               Claims 21, 22 and 24 through 37 2 stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Baker.                           


               2 As indicated by the examiner (Answer, pages 1 and 2), the            
          rejection under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 has been             
          withdrawn.                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007