Appeal No. 95-1776
Application No. 08/096,686
successive recognition events. Accordingly, the stored “data
record” in Baker does not include data placing the chronology of
the data record relative other data records in the database
(claims 21, 22 and 24 through 34), data defining any “hierarchial
relationship” (Brief, page 7) to other similarly generated
records (claims 29 and 35 through 37), and a text event database
record (claims 30 through 37). In summary, the obviousness
rejection is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007