THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RATANA KANLUEN and BRIGITTE H. LIGHT
________________
Appeal No. 95-1909
Application No. 07/563,8871
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, OWENS and WEIMAR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 1, 4 through 7 and 14. Claims 19 through 21,
which are the only other claims remaining in the application,
Application for patent filed August 6, 1990. According1
to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/330,651, filed March 30, 1989, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007