Ex parte KANLUEN et al. - Page 4




           Appeal No. 95-1909                                                                     
           Application No. 07/563,887                                                             


           O             O    R6                                                                  
           5             5    *                                                                   
           Z is )C)O  M ,-SO M , )C)NH)C)(CH ))SO M  (wherein:  M is ammonium- +     - +               - +                                                
                            -3                3                                                  
           or                             *    2 X                                                
           R6                                                                                     
                                                                                                 
           alkali metal, R  is C -C  alkyl, and x is an integer of at least6      1  4                                                           
           1);                                                                                    

           or                     (wherein M is ammonium or alkali metal);                        

           a and b are positive integers of at least 1;                                           
           the ratio of a/b is at least 1/100;                                                    
           n = a positive integer of 10-100; and                                                  
           m = a positive integer of 0-50.                                                        
                                         THE REFERENCE                                            
                 The reference relied on by the examiner is:                                      
           Baur et al. (Baur)              4,814,102                   Mar. 21, 1989              
                                           THE ISSUE                                              
                 The issue presented for review is whether the examiner                           
           erred in rejecting claims 1, 4 through 7 and 14 under                                  
           35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by or, in the alternative,                              
           under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Baur.                                       
                                         DELIBERATIONS                                            
                 Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation                        
           and review of the following materials:  (1) the instant                                

                                               -4-                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007