Paper No. 27
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte TOMIO MINOHOSHI
TOYOHIKO TAKEDA and
HIDEO NUMATA
______________
Appeal No. 95-1969
Application 08/024,9131
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, SOFOCLEOUS and PATE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
19 through 22. These are the only claims remaining in the
application.
1Application for patent filed March 2, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation of Application
07/731,880, filed July 18, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007