Appeal No. 95-2102
Application No. 08/076,160
to said output circuit under control of said microprocessor to
effect antenna rotation in an amount as computed by said
microprocessor to rotate the antenna from an existing position
to the appropriate position for the channel selected as
detected by said control unit receiver and accessed from said
random access memory.
The references relied on by the examiner are:
Carney 4,352,202 Sept. 28,
1982
Hornback 4,542,326 Sept. 17,
1985
Burton 4,803,412 Feb. 7,
1989
Claims 20 through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by Hornback or Carey.
Claims 20 through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Hornback in view of Burton.
Reference is made to the final rejection, the briefs and
the answers for the respective positions of the appellant and
the examiner.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the entire record before us,
and we will reverse all of the rejections.
Hornback discloses an antenna positioning system in which
a channel selector 110 controls a television receiver 105 and
the antenna rotor 120. Hornback does not describe the channel
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007