Ex parte GRIEVES et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 95-2204                                                          
          Application 08/018,356                                                      


          a promoter or catalyst solution which contains one or more                  
          certain types of organic amines.  One subclass of these organic             
          amines comprises diamines.  Of the diamines envisioned by                   
          patentee, the one structurally closest to the here claimed                  
          diamine contains an ethane substituent rather than the                      
          appellants’ 1,3-butane substituent as the diamine bridging group            
          (e.g., see lines 46-60 in column 3).                                        
               Neither Reynolds nor Yonezawa provides any suggestion for              
          replacing the ethane substituent of von Bramer’s diamine primers            
          with a 1,3-butane substituent based upon a reasonable expectation           
          of successfully achieving the desired primer function.  This is             
          because Reynolds discloses diamines of the type under                       
          consideration but not in the context of performing a primer                 
          function (e.g., patentee teaches his diamines are useful as                 
          intermediates or insecticides).  On the other hand, Yonezawa                
          discloses a primer function relating to certain amines generally            
          but not to any kind of diamines specifically.                               
               The examiner seems to believe that the diamines of von                 
          Bramer and the diamines claimed by the appellants possess a                 
          homologous relationship of such a nature that the former would              
          have suggested the latter.  It is well settled that a prima facie           
          case of obviousness may be based upon a homologous relationship,            

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007