Appeal No. 95-2205
Application 07/750,807
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellant or the
Examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answers for the 2
respective details thereof.
OPINION
After a careful review of the evidence before us, we agree
with the Examiner that claims 1, 4 through 7, 9, 10, 21 through
24 and 26 through 30, are anticipated under 35 U.S.C. § 102 by
the IBM Guide.
At the outset, we note that Appellant has indicated on page
3 of the brief that claims 1, 4 through 7, 9, 10, 24, 26 and 27
are grouped together. We further note that Appellant has argued
these claims as one group. Appellant also has indicated on the
same page that claims 21 through 23 and 28 through 30 are grouped
together. We further note that Appellant has argued these claims
as one group. As per 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(5) revised Oct. 22, 1993
which was controlling at the time of Appellant's filing the
brief, it will be presumed that the rejected claims stand or fall
2The Examiner responded to the brief with an Examiner's
answer, mailed February 1, 1995. We will refer to the Examiner's
answer as simply the answer. The Examiner mailed a supplemental
Examiner's answer on July 24, 1996. The supplemental Examiner's
answer withdraws the 35 U.S.C. § 101 rejection.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007