Appeal No. 95-2205
Application 07/750,807
Also, 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(8)(iii) states:
For each rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102, the argument
shall specify the errors in the rejection and why the
rejected claims are patentable under 35 U.S.C. 102,
including any specific limitations in the rejected
claims which are not described in the prior art relied
upon in the rejection.
Thus, 37 CFR § 1.192 provides that just as the court is not under
any burden to raise and/or consider such issues this board is not
under any greater burden.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examner
rejecting claims 1, 4 through 7, 9, 10, 21 through 24 and 26
through 30, under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007