THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte LIANG C. DONG, MICHAEL H. DEALEY,
TERRY L. BURKOTH, PATRICK S. L. WONG, JERRY D. CHILDERS
and BRIAN L. BARCLAY
________________
Appeal No. 95-2281
Application 07/964,5481
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claim 40, which is the only claim remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed October 21, 1992. According
to appellants the application is a division of Application
07/804,137, filed December 6, 1991, now patent no. 5,200,195,
issued April 6, 1993.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007