Ex parte DONG et al. - Page 2




             Appeal No. 95-2281                                                                                   
             Application 07/964,548                                                                               


             This claim reads as follows:                                                                         
                    40. A dosage form for administering a drug to a patient,                                      
             wherein the dosage form comprises:                                                                   
                    (1) a wall comprising a semipermeable composition, which                                      
             wall defines a compartment;                                                                          
                    (2) 10 ng to 1200 mg of drug in the compartment;                                              
                    (3) a push composition in the compartment for pushing the                                     
             drug from the dosage form;                                                                           
                    (4) at least one exit port in the dosage form for                                             
             delivering the drug from the dosage form; and wherein the dosage                                     
             form is characterized by the compartment comprising:                                                 
                    (5) 15 wt% to 60 wt% of a hydrophilic polymer that                                            
             precipitates in situ in the presence of fluid that enters the                                        
             compartment and means for causing the hydrophilic polymer to                                         
             precipitate comprising the drug whereby the dosage form,                                             
             administers the drug to the patient.                                                                 
                                                THE REFERENCE                                                     
             Ayer et al. (Ayer)           5,019,396            May 28, 1991                                       
                                                THE REJECTION                                                     
                    Claim 40 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                       
             unpatentable over Ayer.                                                                              
                                                    OPINION                                                       
                    We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced                                    
             by appellants and the examiner and agree with appellants that the                                    
             aforementioned rejection is not well founded.  Accordingly, this                                     
             rejection will be reversed.                                                                          

                                                       -2-2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007