THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EUGENE H. BARBEE, JOHN D. LANG,
GIFFORD J. LEWIS and WILLIAM A. TORPEY
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2382
Application 07/955,6711
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and JOHN D.
SMITH and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1 through 6, 8 through 15 and 27
through 32, which are all of the claims remaining in this
application.
1 Application for patent filed June 29, 1992. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/703,542, filed May 21, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007