Appeal No. 95-2382 Application 07/955,671 of the invention existed in the prior art, absent some teaching or suggestion, in the prior art, to combine the elements.”). The examiner’s finding that EP ‘493 “teaches that photographic layers can be chill set in a downwards facing manner in order to help provide a smooth and defect free coating” is not supported by the record before us. EP ‘493 does not teach any benefits of chilling in a downwards facing manner. Where the legal conclusion of obviousness is not supported by facts, it cannot stand. See In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1016-17, 154 USPQ 173, 177-78 (CCPA 1967). Accordingly, the rejection of claims 8, 10, 27, 31 and (8, 10, 27, 31)/11-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over EP ‘493 is reversed. C. The Remaining Rejections Under § 103 Appellants have not contested the applicability of the references in the remaining three rejections of dependent claims under § 103 except for the arguments discussed above regarding the primary reference EP ‘493 and the argument that Di Mino is nonanalogous art (brief, pages 7-9). Thus we will only address appellants’ argument regarding Di Mino. We find Di Mino to be analogous art and properly combinable with EP ‘493 substantially for the reasons set forth by the examiner on pages 15 and 16 of 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007