Appeal No. 95-2580
Application 08/110,958
mold in which the ampule is formed. Independent claims 1 and
10 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and a
copy of those claims is appended to this decision.
The prior art references of record relied upon by
the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Juhn 4,641,663 Feb. 10,
1987
Rose et al. (Rose) 4,979,630 Dec. 25,
1990
Hansen 5,046,627 Sept. 10,
1991
Claims 1 through 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 12 through 14
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Hansen in view of Rose.
Claims 7 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Hansen in view of Rose and Juhn.
Rather than reiterate the examiner's full statement
of the above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints
advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding those rejec-
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007