Appeal No. 95-2580
Application 08/110,958
collective teachings of Hansen and Rose which teaches or
fairly suggests such arrangements of the grooves therein.
This particular orientation of the longitudinal
passages/grooves in appellant’s ampule goes directly to the
particular problem being solved by appellant concerning the
need for more precise control of the shape and dimensions of
the passages during the blow
molding process (specification, pages 2-3). Nothing in the
applied patents addresses appellant’s problem and we see
nothing therein which would have fairly suggested the recited
orientation of the grooves/passages as set forth in claims 2,
3 and 10 on appeal. Accordingly, the examiner's rejections of
claims 2,
3 and 10, and the claims which depend therefrom, will not be
sustained.
We have reviewed the patent to Juhn applied by the
examiner against dependent claims 7 and 11, but we find
11
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007