Appeal No. 95-2580 Application 08/110,958 replacement for the cylindrical section 106 of Hansen Fig. 4), we are of the opinion that this modification of the Hansen ampule would result in an ampule like that set forth in appellant’s claim 1 on appeal, wherein at least one, if not all, of the four grooves/channels would be “spaced from said longitudinal middle plane” of the ampule defined by the separation plane of the mold in which the ampule is formed. In this regard, note appellant’s argument on page 13 of the brief re: claim 2, wherein appellant urges that the combination of Hansen and Rose would result in passages being located at 45 degree angles to the longitudinal middle plane. Regarding dependent claims 12 through 14 on appeal, we note that Figures 1 and 2 of the Hansen patent appear to be identical to Figures 1 and 2 of the present application with respect to the external appearance of the depicted ampules, and thus the Hansen patent clearly includes the planar flange of appellant’s claim 12 and an arrangement thereof which circum- scribes the ampule body and neck as in claims 13 and 9Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007