THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BARRY A. MURRER
and DAVID A. SCHWARTZ
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2603
Application 07/915,8711
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge, McKELVEY, Senior
Administrative Patent Judge and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judge.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 7, 8 and 23, which are
1 Application for patent filed July 20, 1992. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/677,411, filed March 29, 1991 (ABN),
which is a division of Application 07/454,418, filed December 21, 1989, now Patent No.
5,021,409, granted June 4, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007