THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ROBERT M. KEENAN __________ Appeal No. 95-2851 Application 08/012,3791 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before KIMLIN, WARREN and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8-13, 15-17, 19-24, 26-28, 30-33, 67, 68 and 70-99 as amended after final rejection. These are all of the claims remaining in the application. THE INVENTION 1Application for patent filed February 2, 1993. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007