THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOSEPH A. PICARD, WILLIAM H. ROARK
and BRUCE D. ROTH
__________
Appeal No. 95-2879
Application 08/085,6571
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before METZ, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of 1, 2, 5 through 8, 10 and 11,
the only claims remaining in the application. Claims 3, 4, 9
and 12 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed July 1, 1993. According to the
appellants this application is a continuation of Application 07/776,112, filed
October 15, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,254,599, issued October 19, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007